Indexing metadata

An institutional perspective in the industry 4.0 scenario: A systematic literature review


 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document An institutional perspective in the industry 4.0 scenario: A systematic literature review
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Diego Fogaça; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Federal University of São Carlos Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul; Spain
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Mercedes Grijalvo; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid; Spain
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Mario Sacomano Neto; Federal University of São Carlos; Brazil
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Industry 4.0, digitization, digital transformation, institutional theory, neo-institutionalism, isomorphism, institutional logics
 
4. Description Abstract

Purpose: The growing adoption of Industry 4.0 offers opportunities and promotes changes in markets, business models, supply chains and operations. However, adopting new technologies and practices is beyond the simple rational decision and the search for efficiency. There are contextual social and cultural systems that influence the behavior of people and organizations. Hence, institutional theory can yield interesting insights in the study of Industry 4.0. The purpose of this article is to examine how and to what extent institutional theory has been used to explain Industry 4.0.

Design/methodology/approach: A systematic literature review of Industry 4.0 and the broader field of digitalization was performed using Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. The authors analyzed the results using multivariate techniques (Descending Hierarchical Classification and Correspondence Factor Analysis) with the aid of the IRAMUTEQ software.

Findings: Results indicate there is little research that uses an institutional perspective to investigate Industry 4.0. Most of them are quantitative and are based on the concept of institutional isomorphism. Qualitative studies, e.g., case studies and the use of theories such as institutional logics and institutional work could generate a richer comprehension of Industry 4.0. Besides, consideration of meso (e.g., organizational fields) and macro (e.g., countries) level of analysis should be more extensively explored.

Originality/value: This paper identifies research gaps and points to relevant issues frequently not considered by researchers and practitioners. It reinforces a call for an institutional perspective where the concept of Industry 4.0 can be understood as a rationalized myth. Therefore, the meaning, practices, and consequences of Industry 4.0 implementation are expected to vary across organizations and countries.

 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location OmniaScience (Omnia Publisher SL)
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2022-03-21
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier http://www.jiem.org/index.php/jiem/article/view/3724
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier (DOI) https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.3724
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management; Vol 15, No 2 (2022)
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions Copyright (c) 2022 Diego Rorato Fogaça, Mercedes Grijalvo, Mario Sacomano Neto
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0